Accessible Packaging With Alternative Interaction Points

For many consumers, packaging is the first tangible interaction with a product. It communicates not only brand identity but also usability and approachability. For individuals with reduced mobility – whether due to arthritis, multiple sclerosis, age-related sarcopenia, or limb differences – this initial contact can determine whether a product feels empowering or frustrating.

Traditional packaging assumes a “design-for-average” user: strong hands, high dexterity, and the ability to coordinate both hands. For those with limited strength, one-handed control, or fine-motor restrictions, this assumption creates barriers. It can lead to discomfort, inefficiency, or even injury.

Focusing on alternative interaction points allows designers to turn packaging from a potential obstacle into a dynamic, inclusive interface. Accessible design for reduced mobility goes beyond compliance – it extends human capability, improves safety, and enhances the overall user experience.

Force, Strength, and Grip: The Biomechanical Challenge

One of the main obstacles for individuals with reduced mobility is high activation force – the effort required to lift, open, or manipulate packaging. Many standard boxes rely on peel-and-push tabs, tight snap closures, or high-torque lids, which can require 20–30 Newtons (N) of force. For someone with arthritis or other strength limitations, a comfortable exertion may be as low as 5–10 N.

When packaging exceeds these limits, users often adopt compensatory strategies, such as:

Instrumental assistance: Using tools or hooks to open a package.
Proximal stabilisation: Clamping the box against the chest, table, or another surface for leverage.
Non-standard grips: Twisting, pinching, or pulling in ways that strain joints or muscles.

These strategies reduce independence and increase the risk of secondary injuries, including cuts, joint strain, or musculoskeletal stress.

Alternative interaction points help overcome these challenges by:

Decentralising torque: Longer lever arms, larger handles, or rotating grips reduce the force required for rotational tasks.
Facilitating power grips: Shifting from delicate finger movements to the robust force of the palm and forearm muscles.
Minimising static load: Designing interactions so the box’s weight rests on a stable surface rather than the user’s joints.

By addressing these forces, designers can create packaging that is usable, safe, and empowering for people with a wide range of strength and mobility levels.

Inclusive Design Principles

1. Redundancy and Affordance Mapping

Relying on a single handle or opening is a critical failure point. If it cannot be used, the package becomes inaccessible. Ergonomic theory recommends redundant affordances: multiple features that provide the same functional outcome through different physical inputs.

Strategies for redundancy include:

Primary and secondary grips: Vertical handles, lateral recessed cutouts, or wells provide multiple options for different ranges of motion.
Internal reinforcement: Double-walled fluting, corner posts, and rigid inserts maintain stability under non-traditional grips.
Tactile guidance: Embossed ribs, textured surfaces, and recessed grooves intuitively indicate optimal contact points.

Redundancy not only aids users with reduced mobility but also improves ergonomics for caregivers, parents, and anyone handling heavy or awkward packages.

2. One-Handed Operation and Kinetic Assistance

Many users cannot rely on two-handed coordination. Packaging must allow one-handed operation without sacrificing stability or safety.

Key design considerations:

Stability index: A wide base and low centre of mass keep the box steady during one-handed use. Anti-slip surfaces prevent accidental movement.
Stored-energy mechanisms: Pre-tensioned magnetic closures, spring-assisted lids, or vacuum-release tabs reduce the initial force required to open a package. Once the “break-away” threshold is reached, the mechanism completes the motion, lowering total effort.
Lever-assisted lids and pull loops: These convert high-dexterity tasks into natural arm or body movements, allowing users to lift, slide, or open boxes with minimal hand force.

Kinetic assistance is particularly important for larger boxes, where lifting and opening can otherwise exceed a user’s physical capability.

3. Haptic Mapping and Material Science

Visual cues alone are often insufficient for users with sensory or motor impairments. Haptic design– using touch to communicate structure and function – is essential.

Effective strategies include:

Friction-enhancing surfaces: Over-moulded thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), rubberised coatings, or textured finishes improve grip without extra force.
Proprioceptive feedback: Recessed grooves, tactile lead-ins, and audible clicks provide sensory confirmation of successful interaction.
Textural contrast: Different surfaces distinguish grip areas, closures, and opening points, reducing confusion and effort.

Haptic mapping ensures that even users with lower tactile sensitivity can interact confidently and safely.

Structural Strategies and Adaptive Solutions

Threshold Activation	Lever-integrated lids, pull-ring loops	Reduces required force through mechanical leverage
Mass Mitigation	Lightweight micro-flute composites	Minimises joint loading during lifting and transport
Closure Dynamics	Zero-resistance magnetic couplings	Eliminates high-torque twisting or snapping
Kinesthetic Guidance	Embossed grip ribs, textured surfaces	Improves friction, reduces slip risk, enhances proprioception
Redundant Grip Zones	Side cutouts, top handles, recessed wells	Enables choice of grip and distributes load across palm and fingers
Modular Openings	Pull-out trays, sliding compartments	Facilitates staged lifting and one-handed operation

Additional considerations:

Edge safety: Rounded or beveled edges prevent discomfort or injury.
Weight distribution: Centre the load near handles to reduce wrist and joint strain.
Angle of pull: Handles should accommodate natural wrist rotation and a limited range of motion.
Visual and tactile cues: Colour contrast, embossing, or textures highlight interaction points.

These strategies ensure packaging accommodates a wide spectrum of mobility levels, from minor dexterity limitations to more pronounced strength or coordination challenges.

Validation and Inclusive Testing

Accessible packaging requires more than standard usability testing. Designs must simulate real-world interactions for individuals with reduced mobility.

Recommended approaches:

Minimum Required Force (MRF) testing: Measures the effort needed to lift, slide, or open packaging.
Observation of compensatory behaviour: Identifies strategies such as body stabilisation or tool use.
Kinematic simulation: A glove or restriction apparatus simulates a limited range of motion.
Population exclusion analysis: Tools like the Cambridge University Inclusive Design Toolkit assess which users may be excluded by specific design features.

Iterative testing ensures packaging is both functional and empowering, not merely compliant with generalised standards.

Broader Benefits of Accessible Packaging

Designing for reduced mobility benefits all users:

Caregivers and parents: One-handed operation frees a limb for other tasks.
Elderly users: Lightweight, low-force designs reduce fatigue and improve safety.
Workplace efficiency: Accessible packaging simplifies lifting, stacking, and handling.
Cognitive accessibility: Clear tactile and visual cues reduce mental load and improve first-time usability.

Inclusive packaging becomes more than a container – it is a bridge to independence.

Conclusion

Packaging is not just a container; it is a physical interface between product and human capability. For individuals with reduced mobility, accessible packaging enables autonomy, safety, and dignity. By integrating alternative interaction points, structural leverage, tactile mapping, and kinetic assistance, designers can create boxes that empower rather than hinder users.

Empathy and engineering are complementary. Thoughtful application of biomechanics, material science, and ergonomic principles ensures packaging is usable, safe, and enjoyable for everyone. Prioritising accessibility extends human ability, reduces risk, and makes every interaction with a product a positive and independent experience.

Accessible packaging is not a niche. It represents human-centred design at its best, redefining what it means for a box to be functional, safe, and inclusive.

Ontopack