Category: Substrates
-
(B) Rethinking Design: Counterintuitive Packaging for Curious Objects
Why would a designer make something deliberately harder to use? For structural engineers and packaging designers, this question feels unnatural. Our instinct is to remove friction, streamline tasks, and optimise for speed. But this assumption hides a deeper problem: we tend to equate ease with improvement. The idea of improvement,…
-
(A) Resilient Design: Countermeasures for Containing Objects
Visualise lifting a shipping container. The box resists, flexes, and redistributes force. This is not a simple mechanical exchange but a reciprocal balance: your body applies torque, the container pushes back, and subtle adjustments of posture and grip allow both to settle into alignment. Traditional design treats failure as an…
-
Design Guide: Choosing Between Flute and Cell
When evaluating protective board materials, the question is rarely “Which board is stronger?” Strength is not an absolute property—it is conditional, directional, and dependent on how a material is loaded. A more precise design question is: “What behaviour is required for this application?” Both fluted and cellular (honeycomb) corrugated systems…
-
(3) Adherence in Corrugated Performance
Corrugated cardboard is frequently defined by its geometry: flutes, cells, and voids. Yet geometry alone does not dictate performance. A corrugated structure is only as ‘intelligent’ as the surfaces that restrain it and the bonds that unify it. Liners and adhesives are not passive layers; they are the active mechanisms…
-
(2) Cellular Structures in Corrugated Performance
At first glance, honeycomb board appears over-engineered for paper-based packaging. Its rigid panels resist folding, its calliper feels excessive, and its cellular interior seems better suited to aerospace than logistics. Yet this perception misunderstands the mechanical intent of cellular structures. Honeycomb is not designed for efficiency through linear order; it…
Ontopack 